SWAT & Special Ops Deployment History
Request Submitted To: Various Commonwealth Police Departments
Category: Law Enforcement
Year Filed: 2013
Background
The purpose of this request was to seek records from the SWAT and Special Tactical Operations (“STOP”) teams of various Commonwealth police departments. Specifically, we asked for deployment history, weapons access, training, mutual aid agreements, budgets, and audits.
The ACLU of Massachusetts filed a lawsuit against NEMLEC, a regional SWAT team, after the organization claimed it was private and therefore wasn’t subject to the state’s public records law. In June 2015 NEMLEC settled with the ACLU, acknowledging that it is subject to the records law. The lawsuit unearthed a treasure trove of documents.
- ACLU Request to Worcester County Sheriff’s Office
- ACLU Request to Stockbridge Police Department
- ACLU Request to Dennis Police Department
- ACLU Request to Central Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council
- ACLU Request to Middlesex County Sheriff
- ACLU Request to State Police Tactical Operations Team
- ACLU Request to Worcester County Sheriff
- ACLU Request to Chief Whalen Dennis Police
- ACLU Follow up to Fitchburg
- ACLU Second Request to Dennis Police Department
- ACLU Request to Martha’s Vineyard Law Enforcement Council Inc.
- ACLU Request to METROLEC
- ACLU Request to Middlesex County Sheriff
- ACLU Request to MSP
- ACLU Request to NEMLEC
- ACLU follow up with Dennis PD
- ACLU Request to Worcester County Sheriff
Surveillance Technology in Schools
Request Submitted To: Various Commonwealth Public Schools
Category: Surveillance
Year Filed: 2010
Background
This request sought documents regarding surveillance cameras installed in public schools, and police access to those cameras.
Marblehead
Lexington
Newton
Yarmouth
- Yarmouth – 1
- Yarmouth – 2
- Yarmouth – 3
- Yarmouth – 4
- Yarmouth – 5
- Yarmouth – 6
- Yarmouth – 7
- Yarmouth – 8
- Yarmouth – 9
- Yarmouth – 10
- Yarmouth – 11
- Yarmouth – 12
- Yarmouth – 13
- Yarmouth – 14
- Yarmouth – 15
Information About DoD 1033 Program
Request Submitted To: Massachusetts State Police
Category: Law Enforcement
Year Filed: 2012
Background
Section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997, codified at 10 U.S.C. § 2576a, permits the Secretary of Defense to transfer excess Department of Defense supplies and equipment to state and local law enforcement agencies. Massachusetts has entered into an agreement with the Defense Logistics Agency, which governs the transfer of military property to Massachusetts for use in civilian policing.
State, local, and university police agencies can participate in the 1033 Program—formerly known as the 1028 Program—after completing several steps. Once a Massachusetts police agency has been approved for participation in the 1033 Program, it can requisition property. Those requisitions are done in writing and create public records. The purpose of this request was to seek those records.
Passenger Tracking Information
Request Submitted To: MBTA & Transit Police
Category: Surveillance
Year Filed: 2012
Background
In the last decade, the MBTA has undergone a fundamental change in how it operates, with the introduction of electronic fare media and the phasing out of the token system. Through the Charlie Card system, the MBTA provides riders with added convenience and benefits. It also is able to collect, store, and share information about millions of passengers, including those who use managed account services, those who purchase MBTA tickets online, and those who use a credit card to pay for a fare at a Charlie Card station. It has also been reported that the MBTA maintains data about the use of individual Charlie Cards that have been purchased with cash, although the use of such cards may not always disclose personally identifiable information.
With MBTA ridership at an all-time high, hundreds of thousands of people pass the turnstiles every day, leaving an electronic trace. Yet, the public is unaware of how that data is used, stored, or shared. In order to enhance the public’s understanding of these programs and to ensure a measure of accountability for the operations of the MBTA, the ACLU of Massachusetts requested records and documents pertaining to the use and implementation of these systems.
- MASS DOT Response
- MBTA Transit Police General Order 2011-13
- Salaries for Intelligence Analysts, 2005 – 2012
- MBTA Audit Request clarification correspondence
- MBTA AFC Standard Operating Procedure
- MBTA Transit Police Department – AFC Records Access Request Form
- John Martino Memo
- MBTA Transit Police General Order 2010-58
- Paul S. MacMillen Memo
- Video Surveillance Evidence Requests Memo
- Summary of DHS Grants
Obtaining Historical Cell Phone Location Data
Request Submitted To: Various Commonwealth Police Departments
Category: Surveillance
Year Filed: 2011
Background
This request concerns the ability of law enforcement agents to obtain records from cell phone companies that reveal the past or present travels of cell phone users.
Cell phone technology has given law enforcement agents the unprecedented ability to track individuals’ movements. As of December 2010, over 96 percent of the overall population of the United States carried a cell phone—an estimated 302.9 million people. Even the most basic cell phones can be tracked. Cell phones can be tracked in real time, and cell phone companies frequently retain records on the past travels of their customers.
The Constitution protects against unreasonable searches, and if the Massachusetts State Police obtains cell phone location records, the conditions under which it does so are of great public interest. The ACLU of Massachusetts believes that the Constitution does not permit law enforcement agents to track the location of cell phones without obtaining a warrant and demonstrating probable cause.
Accordingly, the ACLU of Massachusetts seeks records regarding the Massachusetts State Police’s obtaining cell phone location records from cell phone companies.
Surveillance of Protected Activity
Request Submitted To: Boston Police Department
Category: Law Enforcement
Year Filed: 2011
Background
This request was made on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts (ACLUM), CODEPINK – Greater Boston (CODEPINK), Veterans for Peace, Chapter 9 Smedley Butler Brigade (Veterans for Peace), Greater Boston Stop the Wars Coalition, Boston Coalition for Palestinian Rights, and United for Justice with Peace (UJP) for the records of the Boston Police Department concerning the surveillance and recording of political activity.
Use of Automatic License Plate Readers
Request Submitted To: Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety & Security
Category: Law Enforcement
Year Filed: 2011
Background
In 2010, the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security (EOPSS) announced the availability to Massachusetts law enforcement agencies of $300,000 in federal highway safety funds for the purchase of Automatic License Plate Recognition (ALPR) technology. The deadline for applications for funding was November 29, 2010. Grant awards were to have been announced in early January 2011.
It appears that a key element of that program is the collection and storage of personally identifiable information in a centralized state database that will be widely available.
The goal of this public records request was to seek documents to assist the public in understanding the operation of the program and any provision for the protection of individual privacy.
- addtional funds request and approval
- equipment request and approval
- grant award letters
- Nov 4 release doc 1
- Nov 4 release doc 2
- Nov 4 release doc 3
- Nov 4 release doc 4
- Abington
- ALPR_attach_amherst
- ALPR_attach_brookline
- ALPR_attach_burlington
- ALPR_attach_fallriver
- ALPR_attach_Foxborough
- ALPR_attach_Franklin
- ALPR_attach_Gloucester
- ALPR_attach_Haverill
- ALPR_attach_Hingham
- ALPR_attach_Longmeadow
- ALPR_attach_Lowell
- ALPR_attach_Lynn
- ALPR_attach_Malden
- ALPR_attach_Newton
- ALPR_attach_Peabody
- ALPR_attach_Pittsfield
- ALPR_attach_Plymouth
- ALPR_attach_Quincy
- ALPR_attach_Randolph
- ALPR_attach_Reading
- ALPR_attach_Revere
- ALPR_attach_Shrewsbury
- ALPR_attach_Springfield
- ALPR_attach_statepolice
- ALPR_attach_Taunton
- ALPR_attach_Tewksbury
- ALPR_attach_Worcester
- Barnstable
- Braintree
- Chelmsford
- Concord
- Danvers
- Fitchburg
- Hull
- Leicester
- Mansfield
- Marlborough
- Middleton
- Milford
- Natick
- North Andover
- Watertown
July 2015
Use of Administrative Subpoenas
Request Submitted To: Various Commonwealth District Attorneys
Category: Law Enforcement
Year Filed: 2011
Background
In 2008, the provisions of G.L. c. 271, § 17B were amended to expand substantially the power of Massachusetts prosecutors to obtain information about private communications.
Enacted as part of legislation addressed to preventing sexual abuse of children, St. 2008, § 205, and described by the attorney general as a tool to track online predators, the amendment of § 17B nevertheless went much further. As amended, the law allows the attorney general or a district attorney to issue an administrative subpoena for the records of certain communications service providers concerning private communications if the prosecutor has “reasonable grounds to believe that [such records] are relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation.” The recipient of such a subpoena is required to deliver the records to the attorney general or the district attorney within 14 days. Although the statute expressly prohibits the disclosure of the content of electronic communication, the records which may be obtained under the statute are capable of revealing significant amounts of information about the activities and communications of Massachusetts residents.
The purpose of this request was to seek documents to understand how this authority was used.
- AG Response 1
- AG response
- Berkshire 2
- Berkshire Response
- Bristol response
- Cape and Islands response 2
- Cape and Islands response
- Essex response
- Hampden response 2
- Hampden response
- Middlesex response
- Norfolk response
- Northwestern response 2
- Northwestern response
- Plymouth response
- Suffolk response
- Worcester response
- AG Sample Subpoena
- Berkshire sample subpoena
- Berkshire subpoenas list 2009 internet
- Berkshire subpoenas list 2009 phone
- Berkshire subpoenas list 2010 internet
- Berkshire subpoenas list 2010
- Bristol sample subpoena
- Cape and Islands sample subpoena
- Essex sample subpoena
- Hampden sample subpoena
- Middlesex sample 2
- Middlesex sample 3
- Middlesex sample subpoena
- Norfolk sample subpoena
- Northwestern sample subpoena
- Plymouth sample subpoena
- Suffolk-Scan f001[33]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[34]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[35]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[36]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[37]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[38]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[39]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[40]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[42]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[43]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[44]
- Suffolk-Scan f001[45]
- Worcester sample subpoena
Use of Facial Recognition Technologies
Request Submitted To: Various Commonwealth Police Departments
Category: Law Enforcement
Year Filed: 2010
Background
Under the Massachusetts Public Records Law, the ACLU of Massachusetts has made a series of requests to Commonwealth police departments to seek information about the different types of facial recognition technologies employed by the department’s personnel.
- ACLU Request to Brockton Police Department about Face Recognition
- ACLU Request to Essex County Sheriff about Face Recognition
- ACLU Request to Massachusetts Sheriff’s Association about Face Recognition
- ACLU Followup to Massachusetts Sheriff’s Association about Face Recognition
- ACLU Request to Plymouth County Sheriff’s Department about Face Recognition
- Documents Produced by Plymouth County Sheriff
- Emails
- Goods and Services Agreement
- Massachusetts Sheriff’s Association Facial Recognition Grant Info
- Project Implementation Plan and Payment Schedule
- Annual Maintenance Agreement and T&C
MSA Documents
- Emails
- Notes
- Email Correspondence with BI2 Technologies
- Email Correspondence regarding Project Schedule for Facial Recognition System
- Essex County Questions & Answers
- Email Correspondence with BI2 Technologies – 2
- Memo re: Law Enforcement Sharing Network Project kickoff
- Upgrade and Expansion of Facial Recognition System for the Massachusetts Sheriffs’ Association
- Project Deliverables and Training Info
- Facial Recognition Project – Project Implementation Meeting Agenda
- Handwritten Notes
- Upgrade & Expansion Presentation
- Project Background, continued
- Upgrade & Expansion Presentation – 2
- Software Overview Presentation
- Software Feature Presentation
- List of Police Officers
- Press Release Email Correspondence
- Quarterly Report
- Facial Recognition Project Further Discussion
- Project Status Correspondence
Purchase Info from Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI)
Request Submitted To: Office of Emergency Preparedness
Category: Law Enforcement
Year Filed: 2010
Background
This request seeks documents related to the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI), a program of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which gives funding to the city of Boston under the umbrella of FEMA’s Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP). According to the City, the program “is intended to enhance regional preparedness in major metropolitan areas by developing integrated regional systems, prevention, protection, response and recovery.” UASI combines two areas that are of great interest to the public: the increased sharing of information among local, state and federal law enforcement agencies, and the increased video surveillance of public areas. Despite the substantial amount of funding that has gone into this program, little information is publicly available and there are concerns about how new technologies and systems may affect privacy and civil rights.
Main Documents
- MBHSR 2004 Regional Plan Addendum
- MBHSR 2004 Regional Plan
- FY 2006 Grant Program
- FY 2006 Investment Justification Template
- FY 2007 Grant Program
- FY 2007 Investment Justification Template
- FY 2008 Grant Program
- FY 2008 Investment Justification Template
- FY 2009 Investment Justification Template
- FY 2010 Investment Planning
- Homeland Security Strategy 2009 – 2012
- IED Investment Justification
- Investment Justification Template FY 2009
- Multi-year Training Exercise Plan
- Proposed Funding by Target Capabilities
- Working Group
Camera Documents
- BRIC Privacy Civil Rights/Civil Liberties Protection Policy
- CIMS Budget
- CIMS Project 2007
- DHS 2007 Investment Review
- Digital Watermarks Whitepaper
- FirstView User Guide 2010
- BPD letter for 25 cameras
- MOU Quincy
- MOU Revere
- MOU Somerville
- MOU Winthrop
- MOU Chelsea
- MOU Brookline
- MOU Cambridge Metro Office
- MOU Everett
- MOU MBTA
- New England Catastrophic Plan 2011
- PSNet Study Report 2007
- Smiths Detection
- Smiths Livewire Contract
- Smiths Responsere CIMS RFP
- SMITH RFP Second Response
- UASI 1st Quarter Report 7.15.08
- UASI 1st Quarter 07 Report